Skip to content

For turnarounds, workouts, and underperforming businesses

Technology Risk & Cost Recovery Assessment

Hidden technology risk can consume cash, interrupt operations, and derail the turn.

In a distressed business, technology is rarely anyone's top concern until it becomes the thing that blows up the timeline. An exposed server nobody knew about. A key employee who's the only one who understands the accounting system. A single vendor or employee holding the credentials, systems, or knowledge the whole operation quietly depends on — no bad intent required, just risk nobody's accounted for.

Reducing wasted technology spend and exposure — not collecting money owed.

We give turnaround professionals, CROs, lenders, interim managers, and PE operating partners a fast, independent read on the technology environment within distressed and underperforming companies.

See all Guardian assessments

Cost and risk scattered across systems, contracts and departments, assembled into one picture of what is costing money, what is at risk, what cannot wait and what can

Which situation fits you?

Where the risk actually hides

Some of it is buried in the P&L — thousands a month in software nobody's using, blended into ordinary operating expense, unlabeled as waste because no one's gone looking for it specifically. The rest is hidden in systems, contracts, access, and institutional knowledge.

That's the pattern. The information exists, but no one has assembled it into a clear picture of cost, risk, and operational dependency.

You'll know what's costing money now, what's putting the business at risk, what requires immediate action, and what can safely wait.

Why an outside look matters here more than anywhere else

An independent view

Most existing IT providers are good at what they were hired to do — keep day-to-day operations running. They were rarely, if ever, asked to look at the environment through a different lens: cash preservation, lender concerns, operational continuity under stress, accelerated diligence, or a distressed sale. That's not a knock on the work they've done — it's just a different question than the one they've been answering.

An outside assessment brings a fresh, evidence-based view of the whole environment and translates what it finds into the business decisions you're actually facing — not just a technical to-do list.

Recommendations that fit the business

We start with what the recovery plan actually needs. Sometimes the right answer is immediate investment. Sometimes it is consolidation, tighter control, a lower-cost option, or the confidence to delay spending. The recommendation should fit the business and the plan ahead.

The right technology decision is the one that best supports the business and the plan ahead.

What we've found — and what it was worth

Manufacturing · Emerging from bankruptcy
$66,000
Recurring annual savings from licensing cleanup
$120,000+
Modeled infrastructure replacement cost avoided over five years

23 unsupported servers and years of avoidable licensing costs — an unnecessary burden on a business already stretched thin.

Mid-market operating company
$100,000+
Modeled downtime exposure from a single hardware failure
30%
Licensing cost identified as avoidable
$250,000+
Modeled potential exposure, including breach, regulatory, and response costs

Aging on-premises infrastructure nearing failure, no offsite backups, no disaster recovery, and licensing overspend nobody had noticed.

Manufacturing · ERP re-implementation underway
$329,000
Cost savings opportunities identified, exceeding the annual cost of managed services
14%
Workstations at or near end of life

Physical servers at end of life with single points of failure, firewalls and wireless due for replacement, and default Microsoft 365 security features never enabled. Critical gaps were closed during the assessment itself, including VPN access still active for terminated employees.

Savings and avoided costs reflect what we found in these specific environments. Figures marked as modeled are estimates based on the environment and applicable risk assumptions, not incurred costs.

None of these companies had a complete picture of what the environment was costing or the exposure it created until we assessed it. That's the pattern: the waste and the risk often sit side by side, scattered across systems, contracts, and departments.

What we're looking for

Cost recovery & vendor exposure

Cash, commitments, and leverage, not just waste

  • Licensing, subscriptions, and duplicate tools accumulated over years with no oversight — paying for two platforms when one would do
  • Auto-renewing contracts, minimum commitments, and termination obligations — what can be cut now versus what remains contractually locked
  • Technology spending scattered across departments, locations, and general operating accounts
  • Critical technology vendors at risk of nonpayment or suspension, where an interruption could affect operations with little warning

Risk exposure

What could blow up the timeline

  • Systems or data sitting exposed with no security, unknown to leadership
  • Access broader than it should be — former employees with active accounts, shared logins nobody is tracking, and administrative rights handed out and never revisited
  • Single points of failure: one vendor, one server, one login
  • Mission-critical applications running on outdated, unsupported, unbacked-up systems
  • Technology issues that distort reporting, billing, or operational decision-making — numbers leadership is relying on that may not be reliable

Key-person and continuity risk

What happens if someone walks

  • Institutional knowledge that exists in one person's head and nowhere else
  • Vendor and account ownership tied to an individual instead of the business
  • No documentation a new operator or IT provider could pick up from
  • Passwords, renewal dates, or vendor contacts known only to one person, with no backup record
  • Vendor-controlled accounts, credentials, or assets that could complicate a transition, sale, or replacement

Financing and lender-facing risk

What's on the line under pressure

  • Technology conditions that could affect continued funding, insurance, or lender confidence
  • Gaps likely to surface during accelerated lender review, underwriting, or diligence
  • What it takes to preserve operations, separate assets, transfer access, or support a sale, all on a compressed timeline
  • Evidence and documentation that would need to be produced quickly if scrutiny increases

We structure the assessment to minimize disruption, using remote-first review and read-only access wherever practical. We validate the picture through leadership and staff interviews, system and access review, licensing and vendor analysis, documentation review, and, where appropriate, testing of critical controls such as backup and recovery.

Certified Information Systems Auditor (CISA)Certified Information Security Manager (CISM)Project Management Professional (PMP)

Assessments are led by Jean Prejean, Principal, CISA and CISM certified, with project execution led by Wayne Speziale, Director of Operations, a certified Project Management Professional (PMP).

What you get

A prioritized findings report built around business impact, not technical severity — organized so you can act immediately:

Immediate: protect access, data, operations or cash. First 30 days: contain the most serious exposure. 60 to 90 days: stabilize. Decision-dependent: adapt to the outcome.

We can hand this directly to your team, or work alongside your other advisors — legal, financial, operational — as part of the broader stabilization effort.

Ready for a fast, clear-eyed read on the technology environment?

How this assessment fits. This isn't a valuation, a legal opinion, a financial audit, an insolvency opinion, or a guarantee of savings — and we're not trying to be. It's an outside technical and operational read that feeds into the decisions your other advisors are already making. We work alongside CROs, restructuring counsel, financial advisors, lenders, boards, and operating teams rather than trying to replace them.